Employment should give their staff at least a 4-week holiday a year to make employees better at their jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Topic: Employment should give their staff at least a 4-week holiday a year to make employees better at their jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree? This question was asked in IELTS Writing Task Exam held on 24 Feb 2024, INDIA. You can find the sample answer and explanation of the topic below.

Employment should give their staff at least a 4-week holiday a year to make employees better at their jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Introduction

In today’s competitive and demanding work environment, the well-being and productivity of employees are crucial factors that contribute to the success of any organization. While some argue that longer holidays can improve job performance, I firmly believe that the correlation between extended breaks and enhanced productivity is not as straightforward as it seems.

Body Paragraph 1

To begin with, it is undeniable that adequate rest and relaxation are essential for maintaining employee morale and preventing burnout. Research has consistently shown that employees who have the opportunity to recharge through regular vacations are generally more engaged and motivated in their work. By offering a minimum of four weeks of holiday per year, employers demonstrate their commitment to the health and well-being of their staff, ultimately fostering a positive work culture.

Body Paragraph 2

However, the effectiveness of longer holidays in directly improving job performance may vary depending on various factors such as job role, industry, and individual preferences. While some employees may thrive with extended breaks, others may prefer shorter, more frequent periods of time off or may find it challenging to disconnect completely from work for an extended period. Therefore, a one-size-fits-all approach to holiday entitlement may not be suitable for all employees.

Body Paragraph 3

Furthermore, employers should also consider the potential impact of longer holidays on business operations and productivity. In industries with tight deadlines or seasonal demands, granting extended breaks to all employees simultaneously could disrupt workflow and hinder productivity. To address this concern, employers could implement flexible scheduling options or staggered holiday periods to ensure that business continuity is maintained while still prioritizing employee well-being.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while I agree that providing employees with at least a four-week holiday per year can contribute to their overall job satisfaction and well-being, the extent to which it directly improves job performance may vary. Employers should carefully consider the individual needs and preferences of their employees, as well as the operational requirements of the business, when designing holiday policies. Ultimately, a balance between promoting employee welfare and maintaining productivity is key to fostering a successful and sustainable work environment.

Explanation of Band Descriptors:

  1. Task Response (Band 7): The sample answer addresses the question prompt by presenting a clear opinion (disagrees with the statement) and providing relevant arguments to support this stance. The response discusses both the benefits of longer holidays for employee well-being and potential challenges and considerations for employers, demonstrating a balanced approach to the topic.
  2. Coherence and Cohesion (Band 7): The essay is well-structured, with clear paragraphing and logical progression of ideas. Each paragraph focuses on a specific aspect of the topic, from the benefits of longer holidays to considerations for employers and potential drawbacks. Transition words and phrases (e.g., “To begin with,” “However,” “Furthermore,” “In conclusion”) are used effectively to connect ideas and enhance coherence.
  3. Lexical Resource (Band 7): The sample answer demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, including topic-specific terms (e.g., “employee morale,” “burnout,” “work culture”) and varied expressions (e.g., “adequate rest and relaxation,” “one-size-fits-all approach,” “business continuity”). The language used is precise and appropriate for the context, contributing to the clarity and effectiveness of the argument.
  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy (Band 7): The essay exhibits a high level of grammatical accuracy, with minor errors that do not impede understanding or communication. Complex sentence structures are used appropriately, and there is evidence of a range of grammatical structures (e.g., conditional sentences, passive voice) to convey meaning effectively. Overall, the writing is clear, coherent, and mostly error-free, demonstrating control over grammar and syntax.

Visit our Youtube Channel for More updates